Persons who become
interested in pursuing some spiritual practice often have a doubt – whether by
following this path one would continue to be interested in one’s work and one
would fit into this world where everyone is materialistically oriented. And some of those who have followed this path
for a few years and have become a little inward looking, find themselves a little
estranged from their earlier social circle.
They start thinking whether it would not be better to quit one’s job or
occupation and devote themselves fully to their chosen path.
Before one can venture
to answer these questions, some basics of life have to be understood.
This body and mind and
all their attributes are acquired from the nature (Prakriti). The body and mind belong to this world. By its very nature this body and mind
mechanism cannot live without action. It
is bound to act according to the diktats of the nature. It has no independence.
The consciousness (Purush)
or the life force within this mechanism is always free and is not bound by anything.
Somehow, mysteriously,
when this consciousness comes in contact with the body and mind mechanism,
another centre ‘I’ comes into existence.
This centre starts thinking this body and mind as ‘its’. It also ascribes the ‘acquired attributes’ of
body and mind as its ‘qualities’. This
identification spreads to persons and things outside to whom this ‘I’ calls as
‘mine’. Then all the struggle for
acquiring and maintaining the qualities, material possessions and relationships
starts.
To be spiritual is to
drop this ‘I’ and be free. In absence of
‘I’, ‘mine’ obviously has no existence.
If one’s intellect is
sharp enough to understand the nature of body, mind and consciousness; nothing
remains to be done. It cuts through the
identification and one is free. But we
obviously try to comprehend this through our mind. Logical comprehension by the mind does not
become our understanding. The identification
with the body and mind and consequently with things and persons outside
continues. Because of this, the path of
understanding (Gyan yog) is not available to many.
Another way to drop ‘I’
is to feel from every pore of this body and mind that this nature is also
manifestation of the consciousness and as such everything and everyone is
'consciousness' or ‘God’. When
everything and everyone is ‘God’ the question of something like ‘I’ being there
does not arise. This is way of Bhakti. Few are endowed with bhakti.
Third way is to let this
body and mind act in this world (as it cannot remain without action) with an
understanding that all which this body and mind mechanism has acquired is
acquired from this world. Everyone is
merely using the bounties of the nature.
There is nothing which one has created and which one can really call as
his. With this understanding, one would
obviously serve the world with all one’s acquired attributes and material
acquisitions, i.e., the Prakriti (this body and mind) will serve the Prakriti
(this world). Such action (without any
desire for personal gain or glory) is Karmyog.
Yet another way is that
of ‘Dhyan’, i.e., meditation. It
has two main branches - ‘Yog’ and ‘Tantra’.
When one starts entering
the path of Yog (Ashtangyog – the eight fold path enunciated by Patanjali),
the questions relating to morality, ethics, celibacy etc. crop up as ‘Yam’
and ‘Niyam’ are prerequisites on this path. This is the path of the renunciants.
The path of Tantra
(112 methods of meditation told to Parvati by Shiva) involves total
acceptance, i.e., acceptance of everything, every emotion, every thought,
and every being. There is nothing wrong
or right, good or bad or moral or immoral.
It cannot be, as all is manifestation of same consciousness or energy. Science also now accepts this truth.
As discussed earlier one
cannot remain without action. When one
is simply lying down, enormous activity is still on inside the body and mind
which is nothing but action. Action in
this world is inevitable. So be in
it. Unless this inherent urge for action
is allowed to unfold, one cannot reach a state of meditation, i.e., a state of
relaxation (non-doing).
When action is
inevitable (and in fact it aids reach the state of meditation), easiest way to
go about in this world is to respond to the situation in which one finds
oneself to be in. Every game has to be
played with some rules. Follow,
therefore, the rules of the game (acting according to social norms and law of
the land - referred to as Shastras in ancients texts). In the context of Government service, the
relevant law and procedures, the CCS(CCA) Rules and the Conduct Rules are the Shastras. Know that in responding to a situation
according to Shastras, one is not doing anything, things are just
happening. For example, when a judge
orders death sentence to a law breaker, it is not he who is punishing him but
it is the action of the law breaker which has resulted in the punishment. Action or response according to Shastras does
not bind one (there is no accumulation of Karmic-baggage), i.e., there
are no emotional reactions or suffering.
Act according to Shastra and be finished with it. Move on in freedom.
With this kind of
orientation one would not only fit but will excel in this world as one’s
actions are no more affected or inhibited by fear or greed. One’s mind is unburdened and thinks clearly.
The desire to run away
from the action and responsibilities on the pretext of giving oneself totally
to one’s chosen path is, more often than not, because of dominance of ‘Tamas’
and / or one’s inability to face the situations around. Running away also takes away from one the
possibilities of encountering situations where one’s progress in spiritual
field may be tested. It is the real life
situation that tests one’s patience and capacity to remain unaffected by the
pleasant or unpleasant situations and provide opportunities for further
progress.
As for fitting in the
social set-up, when one is at peace with one self (this happens when one
attains a state of total acceptance and merely responds to the situations as
per the social norms and law of the land – one evolves to this state as a
result of one’s spiritual practices), one would be at peace with everyone. Though with progress in the spiritual field,
the futility of material ambitions becomes obvious, with inner harmony in
place, one would be comfortable in late night parties and discussion on
everything under the sun. Problem arises
when one continues with one’s likes and dislikes. Total acceptance, as envisaged in Tantra,
is the key. Further, with progress in
this field one smoothly acquires a new circle, a new family of seekers. It is like change of one’s circle from
childhood to adulthood or adulthood to old age.
It is a natural change.
One should, therefore,
continue in the thick of action, let the life teach its lessons, pursue
one’s spiritual practices and allow the change of social circle to happen
without any clinging to the old. And
thus achieve peace with oneself and everything and everyone around. And be blissful in this unity.
Osho guides his
disciples by saying – continue in this world as you are, do not try to bring
about any change in your actions. Only
add meditation to your daily routine.
Whatever needs to change will change by itself. Whatever does not change, it is OK.
The basic dilemma of the seeker as put forward in the first line is as follows:-
ReplyDelete"Persons who become interested in pursuing some spiritual practice often have a doubt – whether by following this path one would continue to be interested in one’s work and one would fit into this world where everyone is materialistically oriented."
The dilemma itself implies that the seeker is confused of his objectives. The whole point of spiritual practices is to reach a situation in which one doesn't have an "interest" left in one's work. Interest here means attachment. But this is not to say that he will stop doing his prescribed work. Nor does it mean that he will be working at anything less than his highest possible efficiency. The only difference will be the lack of attachment. So, the spiritual practices will lead to a person working in a ghor materialistic world with his highest possible efficiency and least possible attachment.
Nobody except himself would be able to understand the difference in the work rendered by him and the work done by a ghor materialist. As Shri Krishna says:-
saktah karmany avidvamso
yatha kurvanti bharata
kuryad vidvams tathasaktas
cikirsur loka-sangraham
Obviously, such a detached person will easily fit into the material world. Did not Shri Krishna easily fit into the world!!
So, the idea is to constantly have a check on oneself. Whether am I becoming escapist! Whether I am doing my work at highest possible efficiency I can offer!!
Happiness is the goal of life. This is what we strive for by sadhana. The path goes through our prescribed duties. If we can't find happiness in our prescribed work, surely we won't find that in the absence thereof!!